Skip to main content

Second Annual Julius Nyerere Intellectual Festival Week




Professor Samir Amin headlined the Second Annual Julius Nyerere Intellectual Festival Week. He lectured on the history of monopoly capitalism with special emphasis on the Bandung Conference as the first attempts by newly independent African and Asian states to resist all forms of imperial expansion. He reiterated the need for continued resistance, while predicting the inevitable collapse of an unworkable system: monopoly capitalism. He brilliantly wove events of history to highlight his point about the constant fight of the peasantry to assert influence on the monarchies and governments and to cut their heads off if necessary. Samia Nkrumah daughter of the Late President of Ghana, Kwame Nkrumah, and a newly elected member to Ghana’s parliament, spoke about the work of her father and gave some insight to the kinds of things needed to recapture the fervor and direction of an earlier Africa: the time of Osagyefo Kwame Nkrumah. It was Dr. Utsa Patnaik, author of “The Republic of Hunger”, who addressed what I believe to be the burning question: The Agrarian question. By extension this is a question about peasant rights today and who owns the land and the water.



Professor Fantu Cheru in his introductory remarks preceding Dr. Patnaik mentioned his youth as a sheep and goat herder in Ethiopia before his accidental discovery of formal education. So farming is a very real concept to him. Then as he mentioned that the agrarian question was central to the African revolution, the rain began to fall: as if on cue and to drive home the points. Then Dr. Patnaik outlined her arguments using some very technical graphs and studies that sought to recalculate the idea of underdevelopment. This she did by looking at the neo-liberal idea of growth, development and poverty against her own position which required a look at the food/caloric intake of poor people and that model led to a much higher percentage of people below the poverty line and showed increasing poverty. With a clear and simple style reminiscent of Dr. Walter Rodney, Dr. Patnaik challenged the WTO and economists in the developed world to look again at their models and to see that “free trade” has come at an extraordinary price to the peasantry who still make-up the majority of the world’s population. If you did not understand the graphs and studies then you certainly understood the picture she drew of a man in London, in a cotton shirt, reading his morning newspaper, drinking coffee, with sugar, at a desk of mahogany and taking notes with a pen. She pointed out that the cotton, coffee, sugar, mahogany, and ink all were manufactured in, and/or from raw materials sourced from, the southern hemisphere: Africa, Asia and South America. She added that this was so because the South enjoyed, at least, two growing seasons each year while the north only one. Yet, despite all this production and labor, the south remains mired in underdevelopment and the north industrialized.

For a break from the high technical language of the conference, I visited the National Stadium in Dar es Salaam for the championship game between its top two soccer teams: Simba and Yanga (Young Africans). Before a crowd of about 45,000, Simba triumphed 4-3. It was a see-saw battle but Simba always looked the better team. They had the better buildup, more creativity up front and, I believe, more talent at more positions. The latter fact is crucial for winning anything requiring a team. When I look at some of the people heading up key positions in the governments of the south and the match-up against those of the north, I see reason why we continue to loose in the battle for our resources. This is not to ignore all the past tactics described by Dr. Rodney in his book, “How Europe Underdeveloped Africa”. But when we look at the African Union and see some of the talent asked to match up the talent at the European Union, WTO, IMF, we are overmatched. It isn’t that the talent doesn’t exist. If you had attended the Second Annual Julius Nyerere Intellectual Festival Week, you would have seen the talent. But the best talent never seems to make it to the positions that matter. This is neo colonialism. Soon, we will see Dr. Patnaik representing the south along with the ideological progeny of Dr. Walter Rodney. This is what we lost and this we must regain.

Comments

sweetchile said…
Thanks for bringing this info to us bro.

Popular posts from this blog

Across A Bridge in Linden: To El Dorado or a Symbol of our Historical Dilemma.

Wismar-Mackenzie Bridge, Linden The Guyana Police Force. Improperly Dressed for Peace (C) Norvell Fredericks Demerara Bauxite Company was Canadian owned before nationalization in 1970.Things have changed ((C) N. Fredericks) The People United ((c) N. Fredericks) By: Clairmont Chung On July 18, 2012 residents in Linden, Guyana, blocked a bridge in protest against a plan to increase electricity rates. The State responded by firing on the unarmed crowd. Three people died and several more were wounded. Residents responded by seizing and occupying that, and a second, bridge. A state of siege, undeclared martial law, descended on the community and continues as I write. Here I attempt to show the history of our dependence on fuels, energy, and violence and why the bridge at Linden is such an important symbol. Linden is not alone, it’s happening to people everywhere. It is not a romantic lament about the good old days. They were not. It’s the same strategy of old...

After C.L.R. James, what? Beckles?

Clairmont Chung What’s in a Name? C.L.R. James  The unwarranted comparisons between Chris Gayle and ‘Dudus’ Coke, Worrell and Sammy, betray where Beckles’ loyalties lie and his analysis of West Indies cricket begins. The problem is compounded by where he situates himself and who he represents. The tenuous foundation on which he builds dooms the structure. In placing Sammy as captain, he seeks to do for Sammy what CLR.James did for Worrell. From there he made the comparison. James because of his writings and political analysis is credited with the ascension of Worrell to the captaincy of WI. Of course, Worrell was eminently qualified. After the success, James in a plea to rest Worrell asked, “After Frank Worrell, what?” Beckles in his recent plea to retain Sammy, asked, “After Sammy, then what? Then who?”  There is no mistake here. Beckles fancies himself in the same shoes as James: a kingmaker. Beckles places himself in the same historical place as CLR James. B...

The Beckles’, The Gayles, The Dons, Caribbean Cricket, and Slavery: A Rudie Awakening

By Clairmont Chung All of the three people, who read my blog, counting my siblings, know I have written about the strange decisions of the West Indies Cricket Board and proposed reasons. Now, one of the WICB’s directors, Sir Hilary Beckles dramatically clarified these strange decisions and the WICB’s intentions. The WICB has dropped, fired and maligned some of the best players in the world. Prof. Hilary Beckles, also the Principal at University of the West Indies, Cave Hill Campus, Barbados, recently addressed an audience in St. Kitts, at the annual Frank Worrell Memorial lecture entitled  “Frank Worrell: The Rise & Fall of West Indies Cricket” [i] . In that address, Dr. Beckles described the attitude some players, namely Chris Gayle and Marlon Samuels, exhibit as ‘donmanship’. He said, "Those who follow him (Gayle) and his cohort in the team do relate to him as their don and it is said that he has brought the donmanship into how things operate in the (West Indies) team....